Profile
Blaisdell Medical Library Sacramento CA US
Blaisdell Medical Library, located at 4610 X St, Sacramento, CA, serves as a vital resource for UC Davis Health professionals and affiliated individuals. Access to the library requires a UC Davis Health badge, ensuring a secure environment for its users. The facility offers open seating throughout, providing flexible spaces for reading, research, and collaboration. Computer workstations are available for use, though some require login via UC Davis Health credentials or UC Davis Kerberos (CAS) authentication, paired with Duo multi-factor authentication for secure access.
Notable features include two dedicated study rooms and four collaboration rooms, designed to support focused work and team-based projects. These spaces cater to the needs of medical staff, researchers, and students seeking quiet or interactive environments. Blaisdell Medical Library combines modern technology with specialized resources to enhance productivity and learning within the UC Davis Health community.
Location Reviews
The Blaisdell Medical Library has received a limited number of reviews, with an overall sentiment leaning slightly negative. Most feedback centers on access restrictions, particularly for UCD faculty and staff who are not affiliated with the UC Davis Health System (UCDHS). One review from a UCD professor highlights frustration with the requirement of a UCDHS badge for entry, despite assuming the library was part of the broader UC Davis campus. The reviewer described feeling excluded and unable to use the space for work, even though they were on campus for commuting purposes. Another similar review echoed these concerns, emphasizing confusion over access policies and a perceived disconnect between the Blaisdell Medical Library and other UCD libraries.
While the library’s official information highlights amenities such as study rooms, research resources, and extended hours, these details are not reflected in the sparse user reviews. No positive aspects of the library’s services, collections, or facilities are mentioned in the available feedback. The limited reviews suggest that access policies and clarity about eligibility for use are significant pain points for some users. The overall sentiment reflects dissatisfaction with restricted access, though the small sample size and repetition of similar complaints limit the depth of insights.