Profile
Scott Library Scott LA US
Scott Library, located at 115 Campus Walk, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, is a resource hub serving students, researchers, and professionals in the humanities, social sciences, fine arts, and environmental studies. The library provides access to a wide range of materials, research assistance, and support for locating published data, statistics, and government publications. Its services cater to both academic and general research needs, making it a valuable asset for those seeking in-depth information and scholarly resources.
Notable for its extended operating hours, Scott Library is open from 8:00 AM to 11:00 PM, accommodating users with diverse schedules. Contact details include a phone number at 416-736-5181 and an email address (askusyul@yorku.ca) for inquiries or assistance. As part of York University, the library benefits from institutional support and integration with broader academic resources, enhancing its capacity to serve the research and learning community effectively.
This directory listing highlights Scott Library’s commitment to fostering knowledge and research excellence through accessible services, extended hours, and specialized support tailored to the needs of its users.
Location Reviews
The available reviews for Scott Library are limited and primarily focus on a single positive experience. One review from five years ago highlights a “great experience” during a voting event at the Scott Co. Public Library, though the context of the library’s role in this activity is not elaborated. Another review from November 2024 mentions a “bright yellow library box” near Scott Charter School, describing two “well-packed” shelves inside, though the review cuts off before providing further details. These limited accounts suggest a generally positive sentiment, with users noting accessibility and organization. However, no specific aspects of the library’s services, collections, or facilities are discussed in the provided reviews.
No significant negatives are mentioned in the available feedback. The brevity and lack of detail in the reviews make it difficult to assess the library’s broader strengths or weaknesses. The sole clear positive is the voting experience, while the other review’s focus on a library box and shelves remains ambiguous in terms of its implications. Overall, the sentiment appears neutral to slightly positive, but the sparse and fragmented nature of the reviews limits a comprehensive evaluation.